New Package: x2x

[Jack Neely]

> Just want to make sure I'm reading things right -- please correct me if
> I'm wrong anywhere:
>         
> * To be legal the code must be distributed as GPL.

That's my understanding...and Per has confirmed.

> * If the code is under the new-style BSD we can change the license to
>   GPL when we distribute it.

The new-style BSD seems to be what the license is.

> * The upstream code is not in compliance with the terms of the GPL and
>   upstream authors should be alerted to this issue.
>         

I do not believe this is the case.  Can someone confirm?

> Question: Should we add a GPL Copying file to the package documentation?
>         

Is this absolutely nesicary for each and every GPL'd package?  I nope
not.  :-)

Per, would you care to approve this package?

Jack

> -Toshio



> --
> fedora-extras-list mailing list
> fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list


-- 
Jack Neely <slack at quackmaster.net>
Realm Linux Administration and Development
PAMS Computer Operations at NC State University
GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4  EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89