rpms/yumex/devel yumex.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Matthew Miller
mattdm at mattdm.org
Wed Jun 22 03:42:53 UTC 2005
- Previous message (by thread): rpms/yumex/devel yumex.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Next message (by thread): rpms/yumex/devel yumex.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 07:09:32PM -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> > It's not a preferred Core application and hence must not add
> > category X-Red-Hat-Base. Category X-Fedora is fine, although it's
> > not evaluated anywhere.
> X-Fedora is specified as being required here:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/FedoraDesktopEntryGuidelines
> "Additionally, all Fedora packages must contain the "X-Fedora"
> category."
> X-Red-Hat-Base noted.
> Thanks for the additional review
The guidelines don't say "preferred Core application". They say
"packages that are considered essential for end users". I hope that at some
point a decent yum GUI fits that bill. Yumex might not be at that point yet,
but hopefully it will be at some point.
Here's my argument for putting it there, though: this package is in Extras
and so not installed by default. If it *is* installed, is there any point in
not having it on the menu? If you're in the habit of launching things from
the command line, why not just use command-line yum?
--
Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
Current office temperature: 80 degrees Fahrenheit.
- Previous message (by thread): rpms/yumex/devel yumex.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Next message (by thread): rpms/yumex/devel yumex.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list