New package: perl-MP3-Tag

Ville Skyttä ville.skytta at iki.fi
Sun Jun 26 12:26:12 UTC 2005


On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 20:08 -0700, Chip Turner wrote:

> brp-compress HAS to be called explicitly when you build a %files
> section programmatically, otherwise rpm doesn't find the resulting
> manpages.

The somewhat ugly thing about this is that explicitly
invoking /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress means overriding the system's
rpmbuild configuration in a blindfolded way.

For example, when redhat-rpm-config is installed, the brp-compress to be
used actually lives in /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress,
not /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress.  Granted, there are currently no
functional dependencies between the two.  But
if /usr/lib/rpm/$vendor/brp-compress would eg. run bzip2 instead of gzip
on the manpages (and the vanilla /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress not, which
would be a valid setup as such, assuming I understand correctly how
rpm's system config is supposed to be extended), things would break.

Some improvement ideas:

1) Don't invoke any brp-compress, but append "*" to the man pages in the
generated files list.  This might still assume too much of the rpmbuild
config internals.

2) Don't invoke any brp-compress, exclude man pages from the generated
files list, and add an explicit %{_mandir}/man*/*.* in the %files
section.  Again, might assume too much.

3) Use /usr/lib/rpm/%{_build_vendor}/brp-compress if it exists, falling
back to /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress if not.  And actually while at it,
replace /usr with %{_prefix} in both of the above in any case.

I think 3) above would be the best one (of these ideas).  Your thoughts?




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list