[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Request for review: latex-prosper



On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 18:09 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> > 
> > http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/tetex-prosper.spec
> > http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/tetex-prosper-1.00.4-0.1.src.rpm
> > 
> > fixed License tag as well
> 
> Are there any outstanding issues?


Hi Michael,

My LaTeX slides are usually very Spartan so something thats easier on
the eyes would be nice.  Heres a review:

 Good:
 * source matches upstream & good signature
 * builds, installs, and works-for-me with FC3

 Bad:
 * E: zero-length /usr/share/texmf/tex/prosper/designer/prosper.ui

Please fix the one error and I'll send an APPROVED.

thanks,
Ed

ps - As someone pointed out, its probably inferior to tetex-beamer.
  But Extras is all about choice, right?

-- 
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office:  MIT Dept. of EAPS;  Rm 54-1424;  77 Massachusetts Ave.
             Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
emails:  eh3 mit edu                ed eh3 com
URLs:    http://web.mit.edu/eh3/    http://eh3.com/
phone:   617-253-0098
fax:     617-253-4464


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]