Request for review: latex-prosper
Ed Hill
ed at eh3.com
Wed Jun 1 01:46:08 UTC 2005
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 18:09 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> >
> > http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/tetex-prosper.spec
> > http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/tetex-prosper-1.00.4-0.1.src.rpm
> >
> > fixed License tag as well
>
> Are there any outstanding issues?
Hi Michael,
My LaTeX slides are usually very Spartan so something thats easier on
the eyes would be nice. Heres a review:
Good:
* source matches upstream & good signature
* builds, installs, and works-for-me with FC3
Bad:
* E: zero-length /usr/share/texmf/tex/prosper/designer/prosper.ui
Please fix the one error and I'll send an APPROVED.
thanks,
Ed
ps - As someone pointed out, its probably inferior to tetex-beamer.
But Extras is all about choice, right?
--
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office: MIT Dept. of EAPS; Rm 54-1424; 77 Massachusetts Ave.
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
emails: eh3 at mit.edu ed at eh3.com
URLs: http://web.mit.edu/eh3/ http://eh3.com/
phone: 617-253-0098
fax: 617-253-4464
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list