[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Request for review: latex-prosper



On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 00:25 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 00:06 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-06-01 at 04:32 +0100, Jose Pedro Oliveira wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > I will try to review it better tomorrow.  Meanwhile see for example, the
> > > specfile of tetex-bytefield available in the Extras repo.
> > 
> > OK - other than the license thing being discussed, I *think* I've
> > covered everything.
> 
> http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/tetex-prosper-1.00.4-0.2.src.rpm
> http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/tetex-prosper.spec
> 
> (tired, going to bed now ...)


Hi Michael,

Yes, it does all appear to be fixed -- except for the license.  ;-)

And I apologize for saying it should be BSD because, as Ignacio pointed
out, it is indeed more similar to an MIT license.  And yes, Jose did
have two good points (#2 & #3 in his original email) about how to
improve the package but he completely misunderstood the licensing
issue--its clearly not LPPL.

So, please change the license to "MIT" and if no one has any further
comments I'll send an approval later today.

Ed

-- 
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office:  MIT Dept. of EAPS;  Rm 54-1424;  77 Massachusetts Ave.
             Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
emails:  eh3 mit edu                ed eh3 com
URLs:    http://web.mit.edu/eh3/    http://eh3.com/
phone:   617-253-0098
fax:     617-253-4464


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]