x86_64 status (was Re: Errors on x86_64 (broken c++ headers?))
Michael Schwendt
bugs.michael at gmx.net
Thu Jun 2 19:47:54 UTC 2005
On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 13:42:36 -0500, Quentin Spencer wrote:
> The
> BuildRequires had been that way in core for a long time and it never
> occured to me that it was causing the problem. Are there docs anywhere
> that say what exactly is guaranteed to be in a build environment and
> therefore don't need to be explicitly listed in the spec file?
> (Apparently the c++ stuff in the past had to be required explicitly, but
> now it does not?)
For Fedora Extras (at fedora.us and nowadays), gcc-c++ and libstdc++-devel
have been in the minimal build environment always.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list