[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: x86_64 status (was Re: Errors on x86_64 (broken c++ headers?))



On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 13:42:36 -0500, Quentin Spencer wrote:

> The
> BuildRequires had been that way in core for a long time and it never 
> occured to me that it was causing the problem. Are there docs anywhere 
> that say what exactly is guaranteed to be in a build environment and 
> therefore don't need to be explicitly listed in the spec file? 
> (Apparently the c++ stuff in the past had to be required explicitly, but 
> now it does not?)

For Fedora Extras (at fedora.us and nowadays), gcc-c++ and libstdc++-devel
have been in the minimal build environment always.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]