[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: what's the standard way of including symlinks in a rpm file?



2005/6/5, Yuan Yijun <yuan bbbush gmail com>:
> I decide to put ${_libdir}/libebml.so in %files again though %files
> contains %{_libdir}/libebml.so*, and got this error. I checked #108778
> but found no more instructions, and rpm-list is a private list. sorry
> for this inconvenience :(
> 
> warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/libebml.so
> Provides: libebml-devel = 0.7.5-1 libebml.so.0
> Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies)
> <= 3.0.3-1
> Processing files: libebml-debuginfo-0.7.5-1
> Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
> /var/tmp/libebml-0.7.5-1-buildroot-yuan
> error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
>    /usr/lib/libebml.so
> 
> RPM build errors:
>     File listed twice: /usr/lib/libebml.so
>     Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
>    /usr/lib/libebml.so
> 

Sorry, it's my fault. I didn't do a full update. Only rpm, rpm-build
are updated, rpm-libs is not. After update rpm-libs to the same
version as rpm and rpm-build, every srpm builds OK. It seems I'm not
capable of reporting bugs :(

-- 
bbbush ^_^


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]