[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Review Needed: spamass-milter

On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 09:47 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 22:32 -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> > Paul Howarth wrote:
> > > I'll volunteer if nobody else particularly wants it. I'm not a current 
> > > spamass-milter user but I intend to start using it soon, as my 
> > > home-brewed spam filtering scheme using procmail is too much like hard 
> > > work to maintain.
> > 
> > I'm glad that somebody wants to maintain this instead of me, but you 
> > must be masochistic if you think sendmail is easier to customize than 
> > procmail.  I'm tempted to post my spamassassin procmail recipe that I 
> > hadn't changed in 3 years, but I rather have someone maintain this 
> > package. =)
> Well my current procmail recipe doesn't call up spamassassin at all -
> it's full of hand-coded recipes for detecting spam.
> http://www.city-fan.org/ftp/contrib/mail/spamfilter/spamcheckrc
> So I've moving towards using spamassassin as a replacement for this. Being a long-time sendmail user, configuring it doesn't frighten me :-)
> > Could you please post your own replacement .src.rpm for easier download 
> > and review?
> SRPM & spec available at:
> http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/spamass-milter/

Anyone got any comments, or willing to approve this package?

I've been using it on my home mail server since I built it on Monday and
am quite happy with it so far.

Paul Howarth <paul city-fan org>

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]