Review Needed: spamass-milter

Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com
Sat Jun 11 00:27:31 UTC 2005


Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 09:47 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> 
>>On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 22:32 -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
>>
>>>Paul Howarth wrote:
>>>
>>>>I'll volunteer if nobody else particularly wants it. I'm not a current 
>>>>spamass-milter user but I intend to start using it soon, as my 
>>>>home-brewed spam filtering scheme using procmail is too much like hard 
>>>>work to maintain.
>>>
>>>I'm glad that somebody wants to maintain this instead of me, but you 
>>>must be masochistic if you think sendmail is easier to customize than 
>>>procmail.  I'm tempted to post my spamassassin procmail recipe that I 
>>>hadn't changed in 3 years, but I rather have someone maintain this 
>>>package. =)
>>
>>Well my current procmail recipe doesn't call up spamassassin at all -
>>it's full of hand-coded recipes for detecting spam.
>>
>>http://www.city-fan.org/ftp/contrib/mail/spamfilter/spamcheckrc
>>
>>So I've moving towards using spamassassin as a replacement for this. Being a long-time sendmail user, configuring it doesn't frighten me :-)
>>
>>
>>>Could you please post your own replacement .src.rpm for easier download 
>>>and review?
>>
>>SRPM & spec available at:
>>http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/spamass-milter/
> 
> 
> Anyone got any comments, or willing to approve this package?
> 
> I've been using it on my home mail server since I built it on Monday and
> am quite happy with it so far.
> 
> Paul.

Looks good enough (it works for my friend's server), you may go ahead 
with the APPROVED message and build.

Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list