Status of "not for commercial use license" discussion?

[seth vidal]

On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 03:09 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:

> I would object to it simply because such a license is really not a free
> license at all.
> It also can have a viral effect if other software makes use of it.
> 
> One should be able to use Fedora and Extras without needing to worry
> about what software they have installed and whether or not their usage
> violated the terms of usage.

+1

Fedora is a distribution of free and open source software.

-sv