[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Status of "not for commercial use license" discussion?



Le dimanche 12 juin 2005 à 09:24 -0400, seth vidal a écrit :
> On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 03:09 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> 
> > I would object to it simply because such a license is really not a free
> > license at all.
> > It also can have a viral effect if other software makes use of it.
> > 
> > One should be able to use Fedora and Extras without needing to worry
> > about what software they have installed and whether or not their usage
> > violated the terms of usage.
> 
> +1
> 
> Fedora is a distribution of free and open source software.

+10

Too many people already confuse FOSS with freeware and shareware without
muddying the waters any further.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]