Status of "not for commercial use license" discussion?

[Nicolas Mailhot]

Le dimanche 12 juin 2005 à 09:24 -0400, seth vidal a écrit :
> On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 03:09 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> 
> > I would object to it simply because such a license is really not a free
> > license at all.
> > It also can have a viral effect if other software makes use of it.
> > 
> > One should be able to use Fedora and Extras without needing to worry
> > about what software they have installed and whether or not their usage
> > violated the terms of usage.
> 
> +1
> 
> Fedora is a distribution of free and open source software.

+10

Too many people already confuse FOSS with freeware and shareware without
muddying the waters any further.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050612/e654c3b1/attachment.sig>