[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Realtime Kernel patch

On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 19:59 +1000, Peter Lawler wrote:

> I notice CCRMA have a realtime/low-latency kernel. As they rightly 
> state, jack's fairly useless without realtime/low-latency 
> http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/software/installtwosix.html#SECTION000201000000000000000
> Just wondering what other people think of this, and whether extras might 
> carry Ingo's rtp'd kernel? My 'desire' to enable Extras to carry real 
> decent A/V software would depend on this. Thoughts?

I don't want to have a "one-off" kernel in Fedora Extras unless there is
no other way. I would strongly prefer petitioning DaveJ to get this code
in the FC5 kernel (and maybe an FC4 update).

Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Sales Engineer || GPG Fingerprint: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]