[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Realtime Kernel patch



On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:20:32AM -0500, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
 > On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 19:59 +1000, Peter Lawler wrote:
 > 
 > > I notice CCRMA have a realtime/low-latency kernel. As they rightly 
 > > state, jack's fairly useless without realtime/low-latency 
 > > http://ccrma.stanford.edu/planetccrma/software/installtwosix.html#SECTION000201000000000000000
 > > 
 > > Just wondering what other people think of this, and whether extras might 
 > > carry Ingo's rtp'd kernel? My 'desire' to enable Extras to carry real 
 > > decent A/V software would depend on this. Thoughts?
 > 
 > I don't want to have a "one-off" kernel in Fedora Extras unless there is
 > no other way. I would strongly prefer petitioning DaveJ to get this code
 > in the FC5 kernel (and maybe an FC4 update).

Ingo's bits are scheduled for inclusion in an update.
They arrived a bit late for the FC4 kernel, so I didn't want to
take a last-minute risk that could've caused us to have to slip
the release further than we already did if something went wrong.

		Dave


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]