Build sytems timeout auto retry?

[seth vidal]

On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 07:35 +0200, Florian La Roche wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 01:29:24AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > 
> > > Maybe it would make sense to keep the FE devel tree ontop of a FC release
> > > and only do side builds ontop of the FC-devel tree? We are getting better to
> > > keep FC-devel in a sane state, but we'll for sure continue to several weeks
> > > of bigger instabilities going in there...
> > 
> > if the FE devel tree is ontop of the FC release tree then it's not
> > really FE devel, is it?
> 
> Why not base development ontop of a stable tree? Otherwise you'll often
> have times where you have to select special rpms, like e.g. keeping gcc
> from the last release, but most other packages from FC-devel.

why would we need to do that?

development of fedora extras is for the development tree.

if we want to release packages into FE4 we build against FE4, not
rawhide.

-sv