[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Request for review: fnfx



>>>>> "AB" == Andreas Bierfert <andreas bierfert lowlatency de> writes:

>> I think "Prereq: /sbin/chkconfig" is preferred to the two
>> Requires(): lines but I am far from the authority here.

AB> is it? I always used the preun post Requires... anybody to comment
AB> on this?

All I can recall is this:

http://www.fedora.us/pipermail/fedora-devel/2003-June/001454.html
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.general/4867
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-April/msg00559.html

This isn't conclusive:

http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/developers-guide/ch-rpm-building.html

I guess there's no consensus.  I wonder if we couldn't get an official
ruling one way or the other (or that it doesn't matter) so that this
can go in the Wiki.

 - J<


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]