ipython anyone?

[seth vidal]

>I wasn't sure, I figured it was best to mark them as documentation
>anyway, but that's easily remedied.  Not including any documentation
>means the package doesn't own the doc dir and it doesn't get removed
>with the rest of the files, however. Would adding a '%dir %
>{_datadir}/blablah' be approriate? That seems a little kludgy.


I'm pretty sure the %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} ownership is
handled by rpm within the %doc tag



>Sure, the quixote RPMS should be up shortly (just making sure they work
>on my x86_64 machine at home as they aren't noarch).  I don't currently
>package durus, but will look into it. If it's as easy to package as most
>python libraries, I don't imagine it will take very long.

good. thanks.



>The package naming guidelines page doesn't specify a name format for
>python modules, but I'm assuming the convention is similar to that for
>perl modules? i.e. python-${source_name}
>

yes they do:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines#head-bb4665ea46aa0653710ab594efb3207a94eda636

Submit your CLA and stuff as described here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CvsAccess

and cc me on the emails.

thanks!
-sv

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050301/0e5336d9/attachment.htm>