Maintainership: dietlibc

Nils Philippsen nphilipp at
Fri Mar 4 13:16:02 UTC 2005

On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 15:26 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Warren Togami (wtogami at said: 
> > I think if it was in Core before, we shouldn't hesitate to import it 
> > into Extras.  Any objections to this rule?
> Assuming a maintainer steps forward, no objections. (Obviously, OK
> for dietlibc in this case.)

I've documented this on the NewPackageProcess wiki page.

     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp at
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
 safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."     -- B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011

More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list