Mono Platform
Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com
Sun Mar 13 21:48:54 UTC 2005
Eric Warnke wrote:
> seth vidal wrote:
>
>
>>>This is confusing ... are you saying that mono is incompatible with FC?
>>>The Compiler and tools are GPL, the runtime is LGPL, and the class
>>>libraries are MIT X11. I was so hoping to see them appear in extras
>>>especially with the growing number of mono gnome apps.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>I'm saying the last time this was asked the answer, I believe, was
>>'patents prohibit us from including it'
Note that "GPL" and "patents" also describes the situation of mplayer.
>
> The appropriate page ( http://www.mono-project.com/FAQ:_Licensing )
> indicated clearly that they take every possible step to avoid patents in
> the code libraries that might contain sumarine patents. Yes, .NET has
> patents, but the patent holder has given a world wide royalty free
> license for whatever porpose when it submitted it to ISO/ECMA.
http://web.archive.org/web/20030609164123/http://mailserver.di.unipi.it/pipermail/dotnet-sscli/msg00218.html
If you actually read what the Microsoft guy said, your paragraph and the
way mono-project.com describes the situation is highly questionable.
Among the more obvious problems:
- RAND is incompatible with the GPL
- "patents ... (non-commercial) purpose" is too
- Is this vague post equal to a legally binding, perpetual and
non-revokable license to use Microsoft's patents without being sued?
- Elsewhere Microsoft execs have threatened vocally to sue
I suppose we can ask legal, but I don't hold much hope.
>
> To avoid shipping useful free software because of threat of parents
> would wipe out the distribution, remeber there is still an outstanding
> SCO claim of $600/cpu for running the kernel. The apache license
> specifically disclaims any patent protection. Samba probably teeters on
> infringment for each new feature it implements.
>
> So I pose it to the list again, why not include mono?
>
In the end should we follow the opinion of RH's legal, or some guy on a
mailing list?
(Don't answer that.)
Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list