Packages removed from Core
gdk at redhat.com
Wed Mar 16 19:45:21 UTC 2005
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 14:37 -0500, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> > > > We should rather return to the idea of using a separate repository where
> > > > unreviewed packages are published first.
> > > >
> > > +1. I think this has a lot of merit, for example just look at how many
> > > new packages have been imported today. It's gonna take some time to
> > > give them a proper reviewing.
> > +1
> So you want two sets of builds?
> Boy, I'm glad someone else is going to be doing these.
Let me amend:
+1 when we've got sufficient infrastructure built out. :)
I like, in general, the notion of having "blessed" and "not blessed"
package sets. In practice, it may take us a while to get there.
Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent. the
Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the
] [ dumb. --mcluhan
> fedora-extras-list mailing list
> fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
More information about the fedora-extras-list