Packages removed from Core

[Brian Pepple]

On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 14:42 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > > 
> > +1.  I think this has a lot of merit, for example just look at how many
> > new packages have been imported today.  It's gonna take some time to
> > give them a proper reviewing.
> > 
> 
> And so? What's the harm in a package getting imported to cvs and not
> being built until it has been reviewed?

There's no harm in importing them.  My comment was in regards to
Michael's message about imported packages not being reviewed before
automated mass rebuilds appearing in the public repository.

If they're not being built until after a review there's no problem.

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bdpepple at ameritech.net>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050316/88f65fb4/attachment.sig>