jwboyer at jdub.homelinux.org
Wed Mar 16 21:27:04 UTC 2005
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:55:14PM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
>> I think the summary is: "if it's maintained by RH internally for RHEL already
>> there needs to be a way for that to be pushed to extras."
>> So I don't think anyone is really against it being in extras, but there seems
>> to be some question on how exactly it gets in.
> this really seems trivial, to me.
I thought so too.
> check it into extras and maintain it there, when rhel needs it they
> branch the trees anyway - so you copy it into the branch then.
I had the same thought you did at first, but I guess there are reasons some
think that won't work. I won't pretend to understand those reasons, so you'll
have to ask David for more clarification.
You two play nice now ;)
More information about the fedora-extras-list