ANNOUNCE: Review requests
Greg DeKoenigsberg
gdk at redhat.com
Thu Mar 17 18:08:21 UTC 2005
Maybe we should ask the hostile parties to explain, so it doesn't seem
like an arbitrary decision?
--g
_____________________ ____________________________________________
Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent. the
Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the
] [ dumb. --mcluhan
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Warren Togami wrote:
> Shahms King wrote:
> > Man, it would be nice to have a database driven system to track all of
> > this. New package requests, reviews, approvals, branch requests and
> > build requests are just screaming to be automated in some way. The Wiki
> > is a little chaotic at the moment and slightly unclear on some of these
> > workflow issues.
>
> I wanted to use Bugzilla as a medium-term measure in a similar way to
> the old fedora.us process (but without the clearsigns) but some people
> here were extremely hostile to the idea.
>
> Warren Togami
> wtogami at redhat.com
>
> --
> fedora-extras-list mailing list
> fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
>
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list