ANNOUNCE: Review requests

Greg DeKoenigsberg gdk at redhat.com
Thu Mar 17 18:08:21 UTC 2005


Maybe we should ask the hostile parties to explain, so it doesn't seem 
like an arbitrary decision?

--g

_____________________  ____________________________________________
  Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
 Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent.  the
             Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the 
                     ] [ dumb.  --mcluhan

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Warren Togami wrote:

> Shahms King wrote:
> > Man, it would be nice to have a database driven system to track all of
> > this.  New package requests, reviews, approvals, branch requests and
> > build requests are just screaming to be automated in some way.  The Wiki
> > is a little chaotic at the moment and slightly unclear on some of these
> > workflow issues.
> 
> I wanted to use Bugzilla as a medium-term measure in a similar way to 
> the old fedora.us process (but without the clearsigns) but some people 
> here were extremely hostile to the idea.
> 
> Warren Togami
> wtogami at redhat.com
> 
> --
> fedora-extras-list mailing list
> fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
> 




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list