ANNOUNCE: Review requests
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Thu Mar 17 19:22:38 UTC 2005
seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 13:08 -0500, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
>>Maybe we should ask the hostile parties to explain, so it doesn't seem
>>like an arbitrary decision?
> The process at fedora.us was stilted by gpg clearsigning
clearsigning was only for QA'ing approvals. As it is now, there is
(almost) no way to verify the identity of package approvals.
> and package tracking for new users was not any easier.
> 3. the interface was/is WRONG WRONG WRONG
vs how infinitely easy it is now?
More information about the fedora-extras-list