ANNOUNCE: Review requests

Rex Dieter rdieter at
Thu Mar 17 19:22:38 UTC 2005

seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 13:08 -0500, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
>>Maybe we should ask the hostile parties to explain, so it doesn't seem 
>>like an arbitrary decision?
> The process at was stilted by gpg clearsigning 

clearsigning was only for QA'ing approvals.  As it is now, there is 
(almost) no way to verify the identity of package approvals.

> and package tracking for new users was not any easier.
>  3. the interface was/is WRONG WRONG WRONG

vs how infinitely easy it is now?

-- Rex

More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list