ANNOUNCE: Review requests

seth vidal skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Fri Mar 18 19:28:51 UTC 2005


On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 13:24 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:41:56PM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > > Bugzilla seems well suited to all of the above, provided there was a
> > > simplified interface that ensured relative consistency among the
> > > requests, but maybe I'm missing something.
> > This is the crux of it. Bugzilla's current interface is poorly suited to
> > keeping track of this short of information. Extremely poorly.
> 
> Can you be more specific about exactly what it needs to keep track of and
> where it fails?

Not right now, I just don't have time to write about it - I explained my
concerns earlier. Like I said, I'm really fine with being wrong and
going to bugzilla for the tracking if that is what folks want to do.

I reserve the right to bitch and moan, of course, but not in any serious
way :)

-sv





More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list