Bugzilla Entries

Michael Schwendt bugs.michael at gmx.net
Sat Mar 19 10:22:41 UTC 2005

On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:03:52 -0500, Toshio wrote:

> Hi,
> I started making up a list of packages in the CVS repository that didn't
> have any Bugzilla Components in the hopes that we could get that synced
> up::
>   http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras_2fPackagesLackingBugzilla
> But I noticed that some things in the rpms directory of the cvs tree are
> a bit strange such as autoconf and bitstream-vera-fonts.  So I havesome
> questions:
> * Is this a useful list?

Yes and no. ;)

You've caught too many false positives. All modules in "devel" tree, which
are empty or not active anymore, don't need a bugzilla component.  Same
for FC-3. There is no point in creating components for older packages
previously hosted at fedora.us.

> * What is the purpose of the rpms and devel hierarchies of the cvs tree?
> * Should I be using the devel hierarchy instead of rpms for this list?


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list