Getting mono into FC extras

[Paul]

Hi,

> In case of .NET, MS only have provided Rotor with a research license.
> About the Ecma part, please read this:
> 
> http://lists.ximian.com/archives/public/mono-list/2002-March/004124.html
> 
> the most important phrase is: "there is probably nothing legally
> binding about that statement"

"I have no reason to believe, however, that
Microsoft has changed its mind about its plan of that time to offer
royalty-free licenses on essential patents with respect to any products
implementing the ECMA standard."

This would seem to be a far more important phrase.

TTFN

Paul

-- 
"It is often said that something cannot be libel if it is the truth.
This has had to be amended to 'something cannot be libel if it is the
truth or if the bank balance says otherwise'" - US Today
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050319/f686b5ed/attachment.sig>