x86_64 blocks i386?

seth vidal skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Sun Mar 20 00:42:21 UTC 2005

On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 19:27 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 00:41 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Since I only just noticed that the requested rebuilds for gpgme and
> > gpgme03 in FE Development were not published, because they failed on
> > x86_64, I got to ask:
> > 
> > When and where has it been decided that x86_64 blocks i386?
> It didn't get decided. I built on x86_64 first, and I waited on i386 b/c
> I thought it would be an easier fix. I guess not. Re-request the i386
> build and I'll take care of it.

oh and one more comment.

the failure log for gpgme on i386 is:

Decrypt B 18
Decrypt B 19
PASS: t-thread1
4 of 16 tests failed
Please report to bug-gpgme at gnupg.org
make[3]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/rpm/BUILD/gpgme-1.0.2/tests/gpg'
make[2]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/rpm/BUILD/gpgme-1.0.2/tests/gpg'
make[1]: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/rpm/BUILD/gpgme-1.0.2/tests'
make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.87046 (%check)

RPM build errors:
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.87046 (%check)

The gpgme03 failure log for i386 is:


I linked to the logs on the x86_64 tree b/c they were the first ones I
came to.

sorry, I was wrong when I spoke before.


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list