x86_64 blocks i386?

Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com
Sun Mar 20 02:47:14 UTC 2005

seth vidal wrote:
>>You see? That is _much_ more helpful than silently rejecting builds.
>>Because both packages build here just fine on i386 (although it was not me
>>who requested the gpgme rebuild), and that gives us something to
>>investigate while the x86_64 community may look into the x86_64 problems
>>in parallel. Going to bed now, though...
> I posted the failure to the wiki page where the build was requested. I
> post a link to the failed log report for the failure. Do you really want
> every build failure posted here?

Maybe the goal should be to have a webpage (now wiki, later automated) 
with build logs and links from failures.  And e-mail to package build 
requester (and owner if they are different) if something fails.

Core currently has this automated "rpmdiff" system that looks at binary 
packages after they are built and sends reports to the developer even 
after a success.  After Extras builds are moved onto Red Hat's colo we 
could fairly easily have this automated too.

Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com

More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list