x86_64 blocks i386?
bugs.michael at gmx.net
Sun Mar 20 11:35:04 UTC 2005
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 21:35:40 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > You see? That is _much_ more helpful than silently rejecting builds.
> > Because both packages build here just fine on i386 (although it was not me
> > who requested the gpgme rebuild), and that gives us something to
> > investigate while the x86_64 community may look into the x86_64 problems
> > in parallel. Going to bed now, though...
> I posted the failure to the wiki page where the build was requested. I
> post a link to the failed log report for the failure. Do you really want
> every build failure posted here?
No, i386 build failure logs were missing until I posted about it here.
I saw the x86_64 logs and thought, the i386 builds made it, since the
local test-build had worked fine. I was surprised to learn the i386
packages were not built or released either.
More information about the fedora-extras-list