Explicit requires vs. auto library requires, and fc3/devel versioning

[Rex Dieter]

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Jeff Sheltren wrote:

> Second, I'm a bit confused by Michael's comment:
> ----------
> But the fortune-mod packages released into Fedora Extras Development have
> the same version-release as those for Fedora Extras 3. That's a bug.
> ----------
> Which brings me to my question: how should releases differ between FC3 and
> development?  Are we supposed to have that FC3/FC4 tag as part of the
> release?  If so, is this *only* for the case where the FC3 version = FC4
> version?

IMO, disttags are the easiest way to accomplish this. (and further, IMO, 
extras should *always* use dist tags, but I doubt that will happen)

*ducks*

--Rex