Explicit requires vs. auto library requires, and fc3/devel versioning
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Mon Mar 21 13:52:38 UTC 2005
Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 14:24 +0100, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>>IMO, disttags are the easiest way to accomplish this. (and further, IMO,
>>>extras should *always* use dist tags, but I doubt that will happen)
> The reason I tried to hash through a disttag standard on the -packaging
> list was so that people who wanted to use them could have a unified
> method of doing so.
Fabulous. That's a start. Looks like another list I need to join.
> However, as long as I'm still breathing, it will never be mandatory.
If a package in Extras is for only 1 FC release, I'd agree with you.
However, I, and pretty much everyone I know who maintains add-on
repositories that support multiple rh/rhel/fc releases, feel strongly
about disttags (or in the very least *use* them): distags are (should
be) neccesary, add value, and don't hurt anything.
More information about the fedora-extras-list