Fedora Extras Development Package Report

Shahms King shahms at shahms.com
Tue Mar 22 19:38:28 UTC 2005

On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 14:18 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> tla: error logs:
> http://fedoraproject.org/extras/development/build-logs/i386/tla-1.3.1-1.log
> http://fedoraproject.org/extras/development/build-logs/x86_64/tla-1.3.1-1.log

Son of a diddly.  tla started using 'which' in the build scripts...
These errors should be fixed after my next commit (just rebuilding now
to make sure).

How hacked is the version of mach you use to do these builds?  Would it
be possible to distribute that version a little more widely for
maintainers to use? I know I needed to make a couple of minor changes to
get FC3 on FC3 working for me.  I also vaguely remember you saying
something about getting mach to use yum for packages instead of apt.

Shahms E. King <shahms at shahms.com>
Multnomah ESD

Public Key:
1612 054B CE92 8770 F1EA  AB1B FEAB 3636 45B2 D75B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050322/ee9b4cc6/attachment.sig>

More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list