Missing packagers

Thu Mar 24 14:54:56 UTC 2005

On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 20:18 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:

> BTW I for one never bothered replying yet, because my packages are just
> old stuff that is pretty static now (only needed to interpret old
> archive formats).
> 
> I can do it now if there's a special hurry, though I doubt archivers
> that have not changed for several years will need an active packager
> anytime soon:)

The perl-Convert-UUlib upstream changelog since the latest fedora.us/FE
package update has keywords like "likely exploitable segfault", so you
may want to take a look at least at that.
http://search.cpan.org/src/MLEHMANN/Convert-UUlib-1.051/Changes