Review: ufraw

Brian Pepple bdpepple at
Thu Mar 24 15:27:54 UTC 2005

On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 14:17 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> I've just imported ufraw into CVS and it'd be great if someone could
> review it.

I've started reviewing this, and the only thing I've noticed so far is
that some files have lax permissions:

W: ufraw strange-permission ufraw-0.4.tar.gz 0664
W: ufraw strange-permission ufraw.spec 0664
W: ufraw strange-permission COPYING 0664

These files should probably be have a permission of 0644.

In addition, I'm having mach fail when build with the following error:

Getting /extras/prep/development/i386/ufraw-0.4-1.src.rpm ...
Building source rpm ufraw-0.4-1.src.rpm
Return value: 127

This probably is a problem with mach, and not your package, but still
Seth will most likely have problems when trying to build this.

Brian Pepple <bdpepple at>

gpg --keyserver --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <>

More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list