fc3 tags

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazquez at ivazquez.net
Mon Mar 28 22:44:19 UTC 2005


On Mon, 2005-03-28 at 12:30 -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> Gérard Milmeister wrote:
> > I noticed that some packages in Extras and Updates get an fc3 or FC3
> > tag, other don't. Is there a rationale for this?
> 
> There was no agreed upon standard earlier.  Now we agree on lowercase, 
> so use that on all future packages.

I think the question is when does a package get a disttag at all.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050328/bf3d8191/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list