Mono Platform
Greg DeKoenigsberg
gdk at redhat.com
Mon Mar 14 13:47:00 UTC 2005
Comments inline.
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005, Eric Warnke wrote:
> I don't want to draw this out more than it needs to be ( and I can find
> no "legal" list or email anywhere on the sites ). I'm just confused
> with the scope and leadership here.
I am the intermediary between Red Hat counsel and the Fedora project for
all matters legal.
> We are including in FC4 a java toolchan when not more than a year ago
> Sun lost it's patent litigation with Kodak over patents in java and
> ended up paying $92 million to license all applicable patents to java.
>
> http://www.theserverside.com/news/thread.tss?thread_id=29303
>
> The GCJ list they also bring out doubts themselves as to Sun's license
> to re-implement from standards.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2004-06/msg00233.html
>
> Without knowing the terms of that agreement and a full review of
> gcj/Classpath how do we know that Kodak won't sue RedHat? To move
> forward on the java front and not on mono just seems like playing
> favorites here.
I will bring this issue to counsel once again. I presume that the answer
will be the same, but one never knows.
Legal issues are tracked at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraLegalIssues
--g
_____________________ ____________________________________________
Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent. the
Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the
] [ dumb. --mcluhan
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list