Packages removed from Core

Greg DeKoenigsberg gdk at redhat.com
Wed Mar 16 19:45:21 UTC 2005


On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, seth vidal wrote:

> On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 14:37 -0500, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> > > > We should rather return to the idea of using a separate repository where
> > > > unreviewed packages are published first.
> > > > 
> > > +1.  I think this has a lot of merit, for example just look at how many
> > > new packages have been imported today.  It's gonna take some time to
> > > give them a proper reviewing.
> > 
> > +1
> 
> So you want two sets of builds?
> 
> Boy, I'm glad someone else is going to be doing these.

Let me amend:

+1 when we've got sufficient infrastructure built out.  :)

I like, in general, the notion of having "blessed" and "not blessed"  
package sets.  In practice, it may take us a while to get there.

--g

_____________________  ____________________________________________
  Greg DeKoenigsberg ] [ the future masters of technology will have
 Community Relations ] [ to be lighthearted and intelligent.  the
             Red Hat ] [ machine easily masters the grim and the 
                     ] [ dumb.  --mcluhan



> 
> 
> -sv
> 
> 
> --
> fedora-extras-list mailing list
> fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
> 




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list