Exim

[Josh Boyer]

On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:43:30PM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> 
> > Given that this bones those of us who need Exim by making the packages
> > completely unavailable, is there any chance that you could stick a
> > 4.50-x SRPM somewhere (on the 'net, not anywhere painful) until the
> > issue is resolved?
> > 
> 
> Why, again, can't exim be in extras?

I think the summary is: "if it's maintained by RH internally for RHEL already
there needs to be a way for that to be pushed to extras."

So I don't think anyone is really against it being in extras, but there seems
to be some question on how exactly it gets in.

josh