ANNOUNCE: Review requests

[Rex Dieter]

seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 13:08 -0500, Greg DeKoenigsberg wrote:
> 
>>Maybe we should ask the hostile parties to explain, so it doesn't seem 
>>like an arbitrary decision?
> 
> 
> The process at fedora.us was stilted by gpg clearsigning 

clearsigning was only for QA'ing approvals.  As it is now, there is 
(almost) no way to verify the identity of package approvals.

> and package tracking for new users was not any easier.
...
>  3. the interface was/is WRONG WRONG WRONG

<sarcasm>
vs how infinitely easy it is now?
</sarcasm>

-- Rex