Explicit requires vs. auto library requires, and fc3/devel versioning
Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com
Sun Mar 20 20:34:32 UTC 2005
Jeff Sheltren wrote:
> On 3/20/05 8:51 AM, "Ville Skyttä" <ville.skytta at iki.fi> wrote:
>
>>apt-get will follow such deps just fine. If some depsolver doesn't, the
>>depsolver needs to be fixed, not worked around in packages.
>>
>
> Strange, perhaps that user isn't pointing apt-get to look at core packages
> as well as extras packages - that would explain the error.
>
Or maybe the user is using a broken apt repository. Conectiva thinks
file dependencies are bad, so by default they aren't included in the
apt-rpm metadata unless you use the --bloat flag with genbasedir. With
--bloat during metadata creation apt client works fine.
Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list