Explicit requires vs. auto library requires, and fc3/devel versioning

[Dag Wieers]

On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Rex Dieter wrote:

> On Sun, 20 Mar 2005, Jeff Sheltren wrote:
> 
> > Second, I'm a bit confused by Michael's comment:
> > ----------
> > But the fortune-mod packages released into Fedora Extras Development have
> > the same version-release as those for Fedora Extras 3. That's a bug.
> > ----------
> > Which brings me to my question: how should releases differ between FC3 and
> > development?  Are we supposed to have that FC3/FC4 tag as part of the
> > release?  If so, is this *only* for the case where the FC3 version = FC4
> > version?
> 
> IMO, disttags are the easiest way to accomplish this. (and further, IMO,
> extras should *always* use dist tags, but I doubt that will happen)

+1


> *ducks*

+1 :)

--   dag wieers,  dag at wieers.com,  http://dag.wieers.com/   --
[all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]