New fedora-rpmdevtools: cleanup old stuff

Toshio toshio at tiki-lounge.com
Mon Mar 21 13:46:43 UTC 2005


On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 09:55 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 04:48 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:30:28 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > 
> > > This is longer but more "fixed":
> > >   GCONF_PIDS=`pidof gconfd-2`
> > >   if [ x"$GCONF_PIDS" != "x" ]; then 
> > >     kill -HUP $GCONF_PIDS
> > >   fi
> > > 
> > > Is the cleanliness worth the verbosity?
> 
> IIRC someone pointed out in this thread that the -HUP might not a good
> idea in the first place in some circumstances...?
> 
Thorsten mentioned it but left us without a reason :-)  I'm going on
what Mark McLaughlin wrote here:
  https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/2005-
March/msg00005.html

Anyone know why HUP'ing gconfd-2 would be a bad idea?

-Toshio

-- 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050321/97fc87bd/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list