Review needed: octave
Ed Hill
ed at eh3.com
Sat May 7 03:53:07 UTC 2005
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 16:27 -0500, Quentin Spencer wrote:
> Octave is being removed from Core, so I have updated the spec file from
> version FC3 and checked it into CVS. The main changes are a new version
> from upstream, and a new dependency on FFTW3, which is in CVS and needs
> approval.
Hi Quentin,
Since fftw3 seems to be in order, I tried your freshly-checked-in octave
update:
good:
* builds, installs, & un-installs cleanly on FC4t2 system
* binary seems fine on some simple tests
* based on the specfile from Core
nits:
* rpmlint on SRPM & i386 RPM:
"summary-ended-with-dot"
"configure-without-libdir-spec"
"incoherent-version-in-changelog"
I really need more time to do a thorough review -- the build took a bit
longer than I had anticipated and its getting late...
Ed
--
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office: MIT Dept. of EAPS; Rm 54-1424; 77 Massachusetts Ave.
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
emails: eh3 at mit.edu ed at eh3.com
URLs: http://web.mit.edu/eh3/ http://eh3.com/
phone: 617-253-0098
fax: 617-253-4464
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list