sqlite2 redux

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazquez at ivazquez.net
Sun May 22 16:44:17 UTC 2005


On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 18:40 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 22 May 2005 12:25:03 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 18:19 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > On Sun, 22 May 2005 11:33:10 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > > > While yes, it will be solved by the first 'yum update' that happens
> > > > (assuming the maintainers get themselves in gear and switch to
> > > > sqlite2...), if this situation is avoidable with 10 minutes of work then
> > > > why even have the user encounter it at all?
> > > 
> > > Can't follow you here, sorry.
> > 
> > This would involve creating a FC-3 branch for sqlite2 (which I can deal
> > with, mostly) as well as having the FC-3 branches of all dependent
> > packages switching to use sqlite2 instead of sqlite.
> 
> Aha! Renaming the package and the BuildRequires should be trivial.

My point exactly. Shall I request creation of the FC-3 branch?

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050522/e3106ee3/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list