Review Request: fftw3, cln, GiNaC, octave-forge
Michael Schwendt
bugs.michael at gmx.net
Mon May 2 15:32:40 UTC 2005
On Mon, 02 May 2005 09:48:33 -0500, Quentin Spencer wrote:
> >Who was the one who volunteered to review and approve your packages?
> >Also, where are "octave" and "octave-devel"? They have been removed from
> >Fedora Core.
> >
> >
> Spot was my original sponsor, who did look at my packages before I
> checked them into CVS. Several people responded to my initial CVS
> checkins, and I have corrected all of the problems that came up. Does
> that constitute approval or does there need to be a final review?
"Approval" is when somebody sends an "APPROVED: packagename(s)" message
to fedora-extras-commits list.
> I haven't started working on packaging octave yet because I'm still
> working on an FC3 system at the moment. My original plan was to get
> these packages added, approved, and built on FC3, and then begin working
> on building octave for FC4.
Then you should request an FC-3 branch for your packages first.
This is done here http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/CVSSyncNeeded
and is explained in the Fedora Extras CVS FAQ, too.
> From the octave mailing lists I understand
> this could be a bit of an undertaking with the move from g77 to
> gfortran. Anyway, this was a perfectly reasonable plan back in February
> when I first asked for sponsorship, but obviously the process has taken
> much longer than planned. Should I work on building octave for FC4
> before I get any of these approved?
IMHO, I would really make sure there is an upgrade path to FC4 for your
packages. If you released packages only for FC3 and [late in the FC4
development cycle] ran into problems with getting them to build/work on
FC4, that would not be a good situation. FC4 should take precedence.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list