Package Build Reports - Fedora Extras Development

[seth vidal]

On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 09:39 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> >>>>> "seth" == seth vidal <skvidal at phy.duke.edu> writes:
> 
> seth> Package Build Errors: 
> seth> ...
> seth> xfwm4
> 
> seth> See: http://extras64.linux.duke.edu/failed/development/ for the
> seth> logs.
> 
> Looks like the problem was that it failed on ppc in requirements: 
> 
>         libxfce4mcs-devel >= 4.2.1 is needed by xfwm4-4.2.1-5.fc4.ppc
>         libxfcegui4-devel >= 4.2.1 is needed by xfwm4-4.2.1-5.fc4.ppc
>         xfce-mcs-manager-devel >= 4.2.1 is needed by xfwm4-4.2.1-5.fc4.ppc
> 
> All the other Xfce packages were not built on ppc, so it doesn't have
> the requirements. 
> 
> I have no idea if the packages do build correctly on ppc (not having a
> ppc test machine around), but it would be cool if they did. ;) 
> 
> So, should I wait and request builds of the other Xfce packages on
> ppc? 
> 
> Or is there some way to just request i386/x86_64 builds with the new
> build setup? 
> 
> The build system looks really cool... thanks for the great work you
> guys have put in on it! 

as I just posted to fedora-maintainers - you can now request builds.

request them in the right order, of course.

just built packages are available as dependencies to building packages.


-sv