RFE: dietlibc review

[Enrico Scholz]

notting at redhat.com (Bill Nottingham) writes:

>> >> it would be nice when somebody could review the devel/ branch of dietlibc
>> >> in CVS. It blocks other packages so it would be nice to have it in the
>> >> repo.
>> >
>> > what does it block?
>> 
>> ip-sentinel, dhcp-forwarder, util-vserver
>
> Odd, nothing about these requires dietlibc, AFAICT.

All of them contain something like

| %{!?_without_dietlibc:BuildRequires:	dietlibc}

Nitpicking between 'recommended' and 'required' does not make sense in
the rpm-world ;)




Enrico
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 480 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050519/52ec9617/attachment.sig>