[OT] Re: RFE: dietlibc review

[Denis Leroy]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Enrico Scholz wrote:
| notting at redhat.com (Bill Nottingham) writes:
|
|
|>>>>it would be nice when somebody could review the devel/ branch of dietlibc
|>>>>in CVS. It blocks other packages so it would be nice to have it in the
|>>>>repo.
|>>>
|>>>what does it block?
|>>
|>>ip-sentinel, dhcp-forwarder, util-vserver
|>
|>Odd, nothing about these requires dietlibc, AFAICT.
|
|
| All of them contain something like
|
| | %{!?_without_dietlibc:BuildRequires:	dietlibc}
|
| Nitpicking between 'recommended' and 'required' does not make sense in
| the rpm-world ;)
|
| Enrico

FYI Enrico, I can't verify your email signatures. Thunderbird complains about
an "unknown digest algorithm"...

- -denis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCjOl9N21V2B2op6oRAtrTAKCrSCRdaK0fSAmJxN8K2PNFxitW0ACfXwpt
cpMEWpGirU9e376uNQax2RQ=
=Y5lZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----