static libraries' policy

[Rex Dieter]

Patrice Dumas wrote:
>>Right now, there is not a "no static libs permitted" policy. The policy
>>states that they should be avoided wherever possible. I could change
>>this to a "no static libs unless you have a darned good reason, which
>>you will need to document in the spec file" policy, since some apps are
> 
> 
> And should the static libs be placed in a -static package or not packaged 
> at all?

IMO, not packaged at all.

-- Rex