[Bug 173040] Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rlog - Runtime Logging for C++


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173040


enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-
                   |                            |chemnitz.de
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz at informatik.tu-chemnitz.de  2005-11-13 05:15 EST -------
* version-release tags should be added to the changelog entry(s) (at least to 
  your ones)
* package checks for 'valgrind' (which is available). afais, it is used in an  
  assertion function only but perhaps it should be added to the BuildRequires?
* 'refman.pdf' comes with unresolved indices (toc chapter 4, Page 13 (resp. 9))
  which looks like a missing 'latex' run; perhaps doc should be rebuilt in the
  package?
* upstream ships a GPG signature which should be added to the package (as 
  additional Source) to ease verification of the tarball
* there should be a

  | Requires: /usr/lib/pkgconfig
  or
  | Requires: pkgconfig

  in the -devel package. First variant would be more correct, but can cause
  ambiguities with some core packages 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.